EE FG@4$0EwG 4$1]u}]Í)$ ۉ'U]=N}ljut`t\$tX @EFF FE FEFG@4$04f1]u}]Í$[ۉ'U]M:u}EtOtK$,tG1 E}U GV @4$0t&1]u}]ËE$ڐ&U]LÚ}lju$t@]u}]Í)$Oۍ'UWVEEUt{twUMz BAt41 ?օt&ENtHGBuދE։P ?uڋUB$tMA$u#E@$1^_]Ít&^_]ËE‹E҉P$tMA$@B1U]KjEu}$tKU @EFVU~F B @4$0]u}]ËE)$ڍv'U]Ku}Ett{$L1UE} VUF4~8uP} G@4$0UB 4$ &1]u}]Í&UB@4$,뮋E$븍U]u1(J}EUtE$$t?1 EUFB @4$05]u}]ËE썓$a USI<t @4@0ET$D$ D$D$$l[]fU]=Iuu }}$ tMVl@xtFlu?t]u}]Ðt&džt&)]Eu}]U]HJ}lju$1t!r~]u}]Í,*$ݐ&UWVSE&HtYy9~RO9щM9} r 9uEMA1[^_]Ít&P*D$D$ D$D$$[^_]Ðt&$E@@1fEUP1[^_]Í'UWVS E@ 'GtUBtEPtD$$UBt80$uUBt$E$ [^_]ÐՐ&U]F:Eu}$$t@1 ^F t\RFt3EF$]u}]Í*1$ۍ*$1뾍*$4$1띍v'UE]Egut=@t6p\t/08T$SD$ mT$$֋]u]Ít&'UE]JEut=@t6@Xt/O0T$SD$ lT$$֋]u]Ít&'UE]DÇut=@t6@Tt/0XT$SD$ lT$$֋]u]Ít&'UE]ugDP\x>t9}/k0T$SD$ hT$$֋]u]Í&Uuu}} tFtP@t |$F$ҋt} F}uE]?&u}]Í&'U]uƉ}C0}Ut$Et5$B0UT$$a1 T$$M1t/Et|$$21lj]u}]Í&D$$1UVSBztrvPt&&&f1 ualways to the proviso hereinbefore contained respecting doctrinew>v&tv1҉$n[^]Í&t&&&uRv뮍t&t&@ &Fvt&2&"1vt&t&0fuvt&+fvR8t&v@t&v@t&vRt&vH ɍvBvR ht&vRpt&t&'UWVSz@'ED$$|.!T$$h.E\D$$N."T$$:.U҉t$E[^_]Ðt&UWVSE?}t$tF4$,E t u ~Et$E[^_]Ðt&uUBf&X&&MA0n@ $+‰uF$D$&ations which could no longer find their historical identity in the United Church of Canada and requested if they could purchase congregation properties for a nominal consideration and leave the union.

The church has isolated voices which regret the above, but without reconsideration of "without loss of identity", trusts, and significant legal opinion not referenced in the above decision there remains intimidation, complicity, and the possibility that it will happen with other congregations.

The union of 1925 was a covenant between the congregations and the denomination.

The covenant has been broken.

The last General Council pointed the church towards reconciliation. In our faith, reconciliation starts with conviction and repentance followed by doing whatever it takes to restore the relationship.

For me, whatever it takes includes restoring covenanted identity and a willingness to forgive the past.